Barefoot and pregnant

The nation's super smartical men say sexism can save America.

“The best way to promote fertility isn’t funding parenthood. It’s stopping the government programs that discourage people from having babies…[and stop] the harmful over-consumption of schooling”

- The Heritage Foundation

As we face the terrifying reality of birth rates plummeting to a catastrophic 1.64 children per woman in the United States and an apocalyptic 0.78 in South Korea, one culprit is finally in the harsh light of statistical analysis: the unstoppable plague of female education.

This crisis, which began with the dangerous decision to let girls enter schoolhouses through their doors in 1783, has now reached epidemic proportions.

The historical record charts this descent into educational chaos with alarming precision. When Emma Willard established the Troy Female Seminary in 1821, she brazenly suggested that women could master subjects like geometry without damaging their reproductive organs. This was in direct opposition to established medical wisdom, which linked algebraic equations to uterine dysfunction. This radical notion that women's brains might serve purposes beyond measuring cups of flour has only accelerated our society's decline.

The numbers tell the devastating story. Women now constitute nearly 60% of college students, earning most bachelor's, master's, and doctoral degrees. This educational hoarding has created a zero-sum catastrophe where women, instead of fulfilling their biological destiny as demographic salvation, are selfishly pursuing "careers" and "personal fulfillment." Research shows that educated women tend to marry later, make informed health decisions, and invest in their children's education – a perfect storm of rational behavior that threatens our civilization's proud tradition of unplanned reproduction.

Not everyone is quiet about this massive problem (thank god).

Brave truthtellers in the tech industry, led by visionaries like Elon Musk, have precisely identified this crisis. Musk’s solution? He’s not just tweeting about population collapse; he’s fathering twelve children.

Here’s how the world works when men assume their rightful role as world leaders:

He’s not alone.

The Heritage Foundation also warns of the dangers of not returning to traditional values, which are deftly defined as anything that keeps women away from books and laboratory equipment.

These thought leaders have even introduced "founder fertility" programs because showing women the wrongheadedness of accessing education is only one step; commodifying their reproductive capacity using startup metrics shows a higher level of commitment to the cause.

It could easily seem that the men in the natalism movement are fearmongering, but they make their case with irrefutable economic data. Communities with higher rates of female education show better health outcomes, stronger economic growth, and greater social stability—clear indicators that women selfishly prioritize societal well-being over their demographic duty.

It gets worse. Companies with gender-diverse leadership consistently outperform their peers, showing higher returns on equity and better decision-making. This flagrant display of competence threatens to undermine centuries of carefully maintained myths about female capability and empirical suggestions about male mediocrity.

Medical professionals of the past understood these dangers. Their warnings about academic studies damaging female reproductive organs seem especially prescient now that biochemists like Jennifer Doudna are winning Nobel Prizes instead of focusing on their biological imperative.

The fact that education leads to women making informed choices about reproduction – with some selfishly waiting until they feel "ready" for parenthood – only confirms these early concerns about the dangers of allowing women to think critically.

I’ve created a totally scientific fishbone to illustrate how the problem progressed over time:

As the Heritage Foundation and similar organizations have noted, the only solution is to return women to traditional domestic roles and restrict access to reproductive healthcare. And, as Project 2025 laid out, public policy must curtail no-fault divorce, c-section births, and epidurals. After all, nothing ensures demographic stability quite like removing women's ability to make informed choices about their lives.

The path forward is clear. We must focus on the selfishness of women’s education and ignore the trend of men choosing not to go to college or become marriage material.

The solution doesn't address astronomical childcare costs, inadequate parental leave, or the lack of supportive family policies. It lies in returning to a carefully curated version of the 1950s when women's aspirations were appropriately limited to achieving the perfect pie crust while maintaining photographically manageable children.

The noxious combination of women, books, and the radical notion that constraining half the population's potential might not be the best strategy for species survival is creating existential troubles for us all.

Only time will tell if civilization can survive this epidemic of female education – but for those committed to maintaining patriarchal power structures, the outlook remains appropriately grim.